Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Residents clash in debate over Dons stadium plans

The proposed Kingsford stadium.
The proposed Kingsford stadium.

Westhill residents clashed at a heated meeting to discuss the fresh public consultation on Aberdeen FC’s new stadium plans.

The club put plans for the £50m stadium and training facilities at Kingsford near Westhill on hold in October after a pre-determination hearing in September.

Last month the new consultation was launched, with today being the final day for written submissions.

A hastily-arranged meeting of Westhill and Elrick Community Council took place last night, with around 40 residents and community councillors packed into the Braemar Suite at the town’s Holiday Inn to air their views.

Chairman John Hunter informed those in attendance that the community council had voted 11 to three against the development, insisting that it went against planning considerations. Six community councillors chose not to vote. The community council’s submission will be made today.

Residents in favour of the stadium argued that the council should have made contact with the Dons, Aberdeenshire Council and other stakeholders to discuss what could be done for the community, rather than just dismiss the idea.

But it was argued that the council had stuck to guidelines and the onus was on the club to demonstrate what Westhill would gain from the development.

Mr Hunter said: “We looked at various issues surrounding the project and voted to object to the application. We have addressed it based on planning matters. We want the best for Westhill. We feel the stadium is in breach of planning considerations.”

Westhill resident Kenneth Young argued: “Instead of objecting, would it not be in the best interests of Westhill to find out what the benefits would be by speaking to AFC Community Trust and other partners?”

Phillip Wilkie added: “Surely we have a duty of care as a community council to ask the club to expand in detail and engage with people. It’s not a closed shop.”

Charlie Love, former chairman of the community council, said: “It is the responsibility of the applicant to make their case. All they have done is produced a single side of A4 with a list of activities that could be done in an open or closed space.

“It is all for the benefit of the football club. There is nothing to substantiate that this will benefit the community.”

A further pre-determination hearing has been provisionally set for January 17.

Already a subscriber? Sign in