Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Woman cleared of plotting to chop off finger of ex-husband’s new wife

Deborah Donald was acquitted of one charge but did admit trying to pressure a witness into retracting a police statement

Deborah Donald, also known as Leiper or Paton, was acquitted of conspiracy but did admit attempting to pervert the course of justice. Image: DC Thomson.
Deborah Donald, also known as Leiper or Paton, was acquitted of conspiracy but did admit attempting to pervert the course of justice. Image: DC Thomson.

A woman has been cleared of plotting to have the wedding ring finger of her ex-husband’s new wife chopped off – but has admitted trying to silence a witness.

Deborah Donald, also known as Leiper or Paton, was accused of hatching a plan to have drug addicts break into Danielle Paton’s home, cut off her finger and steal her wedding ring.

It was alleged that the 44-year-old, who was facing a charge of conspiracy, offered to pay the addicts £20,000 to carry out the scheme.

But after a key witness – former crack addict James Vidgen – told the court he couldn’t remember what he said to police in his statement, the Crown chose to drop the conspiracy charge.

However, Donald did plead guilty to a second charge of attempting to pervert the course of justice after police obtained a recording of her and her half-sister discussing how they would pressure a witness into retracting their police statement.

‘I was told by the police I was in danger’

Speaking to The Press and Journal at the end of the trial, Danielle Paton said she was “really disappointed” with the outcome and told how frightening it was when police turned up at her home out of the blue and said she could be attacked.

“It was terrifying. It made me feel petrified and caused a lot of distress as I was told by the police I was in danger,” Mrs Paton said.

“We sold the house and moved away because we feared for our safety.

“It really scared me.”

During the trial, witness Laura Sherrington, now known as Forbes, described how Donald invited her to her half-sister Naomi Donald’s home where they discussed “a job” and where she drew out a plan of Mrs Paton’s four-bedroom house in St Fergus.

Deborah Donald leaves Aberdeen Sheriff Court. Image: DC Thomson

Forbes claimed Donald asked her and her former partner Pavel Bogucki to break in, steal a number of watches, assault the woman, chop her finger off and steal her wedding ring.

She said Donald wanted her to cut off Mrs Paton’s finger and Forbes could “keeps the rings”.

“This was the woman who had stole Debbie’s husband and her house off her and was living the life she had,” she explained.

“She wanted her done in. She wanted her beaten up. She wanted her finger.”

But Forbes told fiscal depute Darren Harty that she had no intention of carrying out the scheme, adding that she only agreed so that Donald would continue to shell out money to feed her drug addiction.

Pavel Bogucki also took the witness stand and he claimed she had fabricated Donald’s involvement and admitted lying in his police statement at the time.

Key witness can’t remember if he was truthful

In evidence today, James Vidgen told Mr Harty he couldn’t remember giving a statement to police due to being a drug addict at the time.

He had originally told detectives he had overheard Donald and Forbes discussing the plot.

“Is it the case that you don’t know whether what you said in your statement is true?” Mr Harty asked Vidgen.

“Yes. I can’t tell whether it’s the truth,” Vidgen replied.

“Is it possible that Laura [Forbes] manipulated you?” Harty asked.

“That’s possible as well,” Vidgen responded.

Following Vidgen’s evidence, the Crown withdrew the charge of conspiracy against Donald and chose to no longer seek a conviction.

Incriminating phonecall

With regard to the charge that Donald and her half-sister discussed how they would pressure a witness into retracting their police statement, Mr Harty told the court that a telephone call took place between the pair which was recorded between April 9 2020 and July 1 2020.

“In that telephone call the accused is having a discussion with Miss Naomi Donald about approaching Laura Sherrington and asking her to retract her statement,” Mr Harty said.

“The conversation lasts for about 33 minutes and there are a number of references during that call where it is discussed about Laura Sherrington retracting her statement.

“The conversation went back and forth until Naomi Donald advised that she had spoken to Laura Sherrington about it but that she point blank refused to do it.”

Deborah Donald admitted one charge of attempting to pervert the course of justice.

Sentence was deferred in order for a criminal justice social work report and a restriction of liberty order assessment to be carried out.

Donald, of Laburnam Grove, Peterhead, will return for sentencing next month.