Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Scottish Government officials accused of planning cull of 300,000 beef cattle

Scottish Government officials have been accused of blocking proposals to help the beef sector reduce its emissions.
Scottish Government officials have been accused of blocking proposals to help the beef sector reduce its emissions.

A leading Scottish farmer has accused Scottish Government officials of blocking proposals to help the beef sector reduce its emissions and instead proposing a mass cull of cattle.

Jim Walker – a former NFU Scotland president who co-chaired the Scottish Government’s suckler beef climate group – said the proposals developed by the group were being held up by civil servants despite Fergus Ewing, Rural Economy Secretary at the time, instructing officials to implement them.

Mr Walker accused civil servants of pushing an “anti-meat agenda” and said he had been told they were proposing a cull of 300,000 beef cattle from a national herd of 1.2 million cattle as a solution to reducing emissions from the sector.

“We actually designed a scheme [for the beef sector] and it was ready to go at the beginning of March, but Scottish Government officials refused to sign it off,” said Mr Walker.

“The truth is there’s a group of people inside government at official level who are interested in one thing, and one thing only, and that’s less red meat and less dairy in the diet and they will cut [livestock] numbers to meet Scottish climate change targets without any care to the rural economy.”

Jim Walker.

He added: “They have been given ministerial instructions and simply refused to implement them. It’s unbelievable.”

The current NFU Scotland president, Martin Kennedy, condemned any proposals to reduce livestock numbers in Scotland.

He said: “It would be a disastrous decision, wholly unacceptable to our industry, were any option put forward by Scottish Government that involved cutting cow numbers by 300,000 as a solution to tackle climate change.

“That lack of vision, ambition and understanding would be a complete disaster from a livestock point of view, and have a massive knock-on impact on our cereal sector given the volumes of grain grown for feed. The interdependency between agricultural sectors in Scotland should never be underestimated.”

A Scottish Government spokesman said Mr Walker’s claims were “without foundation” and his group’s proposals were not yet at a stage where assurance could be given for them to go ahead.

He said: “The Scottish Government has been clear that it will work with the farming sector to achieve the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions as set out in the Climate Change Plan Update including the required reduction from agriculture, which was agreed by the Scottish Cabinet and laid before the Scottish Parliament.”

He said the Scottish Government was currently analysing the reports from farmer-led groups, and any decisions on next steps were a matter for future Government Ministers.

The spokesman added: “Civil servants have acted properly throughout this process, entirely in keeping with their obligation under the civil service code.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]