Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Controversial biomass plant near Elgin refused after fears it would endanger road users and become lifelong blight to locals

Both developers and objectors had the opportunity to talk about the application before a decision was made.

Artist impression of gas plant.
A visualisation of the plant from the north looking south. Supplied by Arthian/Moray Council.

A biomass plant near Elgin has been refused amid fears it would endanger road users and become a blight on the rural community.

Developers were grilled by councillors as they sought permission for an industrial plant on a Longmorn greenfield site.

Local objectors were also given a chance to raise their concerns with the council.

The plant would have processed distillery waste into biomethane to be used as fuel or injected into the gas grid.

Council officers had previously recommended the plant was refused after 51 objections were submitted.

What did the developers say?

Daniel Lambert, a director at developers Acorn Bioenergy, legal advisor Colin Innes and consultant Kenny Shand were grilled by councillors.

Officials had previously called into question Acorn’s choice of location, greenhouse emissions and economic benefits.

Daniel Lambert said Acorn’s plant would save 27,000 tonnes of carbon emissions every year, the equivalent to taking 18,000 cars off the road and lowering Moray’s emissions by 6%.

Developers say they have listened to responses and amended their proposals when visualising the site. Supplied by Arthian/Moray Council.

Mr Lambert argued the carbon emission savings had been verified by a third party and that they “stand strongly” behind their figures.

Colin Innes said the plant is both an “urgent and long term essential piece of infrastructure” for local distilleries and the Longmorn site was the best available.

Locals have their say

Postman Peter Regan addressed the hearing, giving his concerns on the proposal.

He said: “This development is taking us from living next to some of the most beautiful land in Scotland to living next to an industrial plant.”

The suggested 12-hour, seven days a week operation would be “blighting our lives every day for 25 years,” he added.

Longmorn locals Neil Sneddon and Peter Regan were happy with today’s result. Image: Will Angus/DC Thomson

Mr Regan told councillors he had concerns on the smell and operation of the plant, and the dangers of more HGVs travelling and turning on the A941 Rothes road.

He added: “I love the idea of us using waste to produce energy, but I feel this is the wrong site at the wrong time.”

Road safety concerns for residents

Other local objectors David Duff and Neil Sneddon dismissed developer changes to make their proposed A941 access junction safer.

Mr Sneddon said: “Any junction facilitating slow moving traffic entering or leaving the A941 is going to be extremely dangerous and will undoubtedly result in more crashes, injury or worse.”

Locals spoke of the number of accidents and fatalities they have experienced on the Longmorn stretch of the A941. Image: Jason Hedges/DC Thomson.

David Duff, an ex-policeman with over 30 years in traffic management said “people will die” on the road if the plans went ahead.

He said: “The nature of the transport going in and out of this plant is hazardous.

“Access to the plant really needs to be not just to the standard that is required but above the standard, otherwise people will die and I’ve seen enough death on the roads.”

Planners said Acorn had gone beyond the minimum road safety expectations, but councillors decided this was not enough.

Competitor scolds hopeful developer

David Olwell, a representative of Grissan Riverside Ltd also attended the hearing to object to Acorn’s proposal.

They currently run their own digestion plant at Glenfiddich distillery and have feedstock supply contracts with Chivas Brothers, William Grant & Sons and Diageo.

Mr Olwell told councillors the development provides “no local benefit” and Grissan cover much of the local area with their own business.

The Countryside around Town (CAT) protected green space around Elgin, which the site fell into. Supplied by Moray Council.

He said: “This is an almost ten-hectare development which gives rise to significant adverse and visual offence.”

“Approval for this case would set an unwanted precedent for both the council and the anaerobic digestion industry.”

Councillors decide on development

Councillors were unanimous in their decision to refuse the plant.

Draeyk van der Horn said the development would impact on designated countryside around town area, and agreed with the local road safety concerns.

He added the developer’s community contributions were “absolutely insufficient.”

Marc Macrae and Sonya Warren both agreed it was “great technology” but said Longmorn was the wrong place for the plant.

It is now up to Acorn bioenergy to decide if they will appeal the council’s decision.

For more Elgin news and updates visit our dedicated page and join our local Facebook group.

Read more Elgin stories

Conversation