Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

SNP fishing ban plan compared to Highland Clearances as Rishi Sunak told to intervene

Highlands MP Jamie Stone claimed he would 'not be silenced' as he sparked another clash between the SNP and Tories over rules restricting activities in proposed Highly Protected Marine Areas.

The SNP plan to introduce Highy Protected Marine Areas. Image: Wullie Marr/DC Thomson.
The SNP plan to introduce Highy Protected Marine Areas. Image: Wullie Marr/DC Thomson.

Controversial SNP proposals to restrict fishing in Scotland were compared to a second Highland Clearances, as Prime Minister Rishi Sunak was invited to intervene.

Lib Dem Jamie Stone dramatically proclaimed he would “not be silenced” as he slated the Scottish Government’s plans to introduce Highly Protected Marine Areas (HPMAs) by 2026.

The Caithness, Sutherland and Ross MP said the Tories must now “step in” to amend the scheme so it works for Highland residents.

His invitation during Prime Minister’s Questions will reignite the row over the UK Government’s role in devolved Scottish affairs at Holyrood.

Rishi Sunak was urged to intervene. Image: Shutterstock.

What are Highly Protected Marine Areas?

HPMAs would cover at least 10% of Scotland’s seas once introduced, banning commercial and recreational fishing with the aim of helping marine wildlife.

Supporters say the policy is needed to tackle climate change, while critics warn new laws would drastically harm fishing businesses in already struggling rural areas.

The proposals have been put forward as a result of the SNP’s power-sharing agreement with the Greens and have proven controversial among nationalist backbenchers.

Highland rebel Fergus Ewing tore up a document outlining the plans in Holyrood and warned a fishing ban would “haunt” Humza Yousaf’s government.

During his intervention in Westminster, Mr Stone pointed to Mr Ewing’s tirade against his own party.

Lib Dem MP Jamie Stone. Image: Supplied.

The Lib Dem MP said: “This proposal is deeply controversial all over Scotland. It has even led to it being compared with a second Highland Clearances.”

He was met with loud groans from the SNP benches as one nationalist MP was heard branding the comparison “shameful”.

But Mr Stone continued: “I will not be silenced. This matters deeply to my constituents.

“Is it not time for the UK Government to step in to work with the devolved administrations to come up with a conservation scheme that is acceptable in our fishing communities all round the UK?”

Fergus Ewing has been a vocal critic of HPMAs. Image: PA.

Mr Sunak agreed with Mr Stone’s criticisms and said: “He is right to raise the concerns that have been raised, not just by them but by members of the SNP’s own party about the potentially damaging impact of their plans.

“I would encourage the SNP to continue working with the Scottish fishing industry and coastal communities to understand their concerns and, as we’ve seen them recently U-turn on other poorly thought-out decisions, hopefully they can relook at this one too.”

Devolution damage

Four months ago the Tories stepped in to block the SNP’s gender reforms, and they have repeatedly refused to allow an independence referendum.

We reported earlier Mr Yousaf’s party has been told to “listen and act” to the backlash surrounding their marine proposals ahead of a major fishing industry conference in Aberdeen.

One industry leader warned HPMAs would be “catastrophic” and risked pushing firms “into the red” if significant changes are not made.

Conversation