Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Rowett plan comes back to committee in light of legal ruling

Post Thumbnail

A planning application for nearly 2,000 homes in Aberdeen will be sent back to the council after a landmark legal ruling involving the Queen’s cousin and an Aberdeenshire housing estate.

Plans were approved last September for 1,700 homes, and shops, schools and community centres at Rowett South in Bucksburn.

Councillors unanimously agreed to approve the proposals, which were tabled by Aberdeen University and Bon Accord Land Promotion, subject to a number of conditions.

But now the report will have to return to the planning, development, and management committee next Thursday.

The Duke of Fife – the landowner behind the Chapelton of Elsick development near Newtonhill – went to the Court of Session earlier this year, challenging an £8million developer contribution bill to the strategic transport fund.

He argued the cash demand was unlawful, and the court upheld his claim, prior to reducing the bill to just £287,000.

The report to councillors read: “At its meeting on September 17, 2015 the committee agreed a willingness to approve this application, but to withhold the consent document until the applicant had entered into a legal agreement to secure developer contributions and affordable housing.

“This included financial contributions towards the Strategic Transport Fund. Subsequently, a legal challenge was lodged at the Court of Session (Inner House) by the Elsick Development Company Ltd and Goodgrun Ltd.

“The Inner House issued its decision on April 29, 2016 which allowed the appeal and quashed the STF supplementary guidance.

“In light of this new material consideration emerging since the committee considered the application, there is now a requirement to refer the application back to committee.

“This is in order that the matter of the development’s impact upon the strategic transport network can be considered in the absence of the STF Supplementary Guidance.

“Although the committee are required to re-consider the application in its entirety, because the only material consideration to have changed is that in relation to the STF, this report looks at the issue of strategic transport only.”

Council planners have recommended approval with conditions such as a 25% affordable housing contribution.

Aberdeen University did not respond to a request for comment.