Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

War of words between incinerator objectors and council

How Aberdeen's energy from waste plant could look.
How Aberdeen's energy from waste plant could look.

Objectors battling a controversial £150million waste incinerator project planned for Aberdeen have become locked in a war of words with the council’s chief executive.

Last October, councillors caused outrage in some quarters when they backed the £150million Tullos project, which will convert waste from homes in the Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire and Moray into energy.

The energy from waste (EfW) facility aims to reduce the carbon footprint of the local authority, in advance of tough Scottish Government regulations due to be imposed by 2021.

But long term objector Bill Skidmore questioned the legality of the decision given that councillors could not base their decision on any financial information on the scheme presented to them.

Concerns have been raised that the multi-million pound project could become a “stranded asset” with more countries moving away from waste incineration.

Mr Skidmore has written to the council several times on the issue and some of his complaints are with the public ombudsman.

He has written to chief executive Angela Scott in June but has been informed that since his complaint came more than six months after the decision it won’t be taken forward.

But Ms Scott replied: “It is considered that all the financial considerations relevant to determination of the application are clearly articulated and explained in the committee report.

“No further information – whether this be from the business case, or from elsewhere, was required to inform the judgement that was made.”

Mr Skidmore said: “This council operates in its own little bubble with systems in place to protect it; it is virtually impossible to hold the council to account.”

A council spokeswoman said: “In relation to the complaint of maladministration raised in June 2017, as this was outwith the 6 month deadline to lodge a formal complaint, the subject was responded to as a query. We are satisfied the concerns raised are answered in the response.”