Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Plans for £45m school in Tain met with mixed reviews

Post Thumbnail

Plans by Highland Council for a new £45 million super school in Tain were met with mixed reviews as public consultations took place yesterday.

The new academy will be home to students between the ages of three and 18 years old and is poised for development on one of four sites, including Tain Craighill, Tain Kirksheaf, Tain Burgage and the current Tain Royal Academy grounds.

During the meeting at Tain Parish Church, several residents were unhappy that the former Tain Royal Academy site remained as one four proposed development plots for the school despite ‘objection’ during the first band of consultations in 2014, stating the site was far too small to house the school.

One local resident said: “I am still concerned that it’s still in the running. It’s the smallest site out of the other three and I don’t quite grasp why you still feel this site is feasible.”

However, another resident hit back saying he was ‘disappointed that the consultation process had started again’ adding ‘there was nothing wrong with the Tain Royal Academy site’ at the outset.

Several residents also called for a community-wide survey to be distributed to allow residents to vote on which site they favoured most.

The meeting was the first of two sessions taking place in the town before final plans are submitted at the next committee meeting being held on May 30.

Councillor Alasdair Rhind for Tain and Easter Ross said that despite hearing the concerns raised by his constituents, he still feels the former academy site would be the ideal location for the new development. He said: “I think we have to let that run its course to see what comes out of the situation and what opinion we are getting back from that.

“I am very much in favour of the development going onto the TRA site. I am of the same opinion as I was last year. The site is good and big enough for the development. My mind hasn’t been changed on that. I have listened really closely to the concerns we have heard but we have to think of the cost of the project.

“At the end of the day, we have to see what the development will cost on one site and the other site. Highland Council have completely gone about it the right way.”