Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Car parking charges introduced across the Highlands

Post Thumbnail

Councillors yesterday agreed to introduce car parking charges across the Highland region yesterday.

After considering a review carried out by the council’s redesign board, the majority of councillors voted for charges to be brought in through a model described as a “real shift towards localism”.

Decisions on car parking, along with a budget, would be devolved to local communities, and any income made from the scheme will stay within the communities.

To help Dingwall, Nairn and Alness, the councillors agreed that in the first year of operation, 2018/19, the local authority will underwrite any shortfall in income targets set for parking charges.

The abrupt introduction of car parking charges in these areas caused a storm of protest when they were announced in February’s council budget.

Ward councillors, businesses and the public said they had never been consulted ande argued that there was no need for them as a form of traffic management.

The row escalated to threats to resign from the council’s administration by Ross & Cromarty and Nairn members.

To counter the recommendations of the redesign board, Dingwall and Seaforth councillor Graham Mackenzie proposed that an immediate impact assessment on the introduction of parking charges for each ward in Ross & Cromarty and Nairn be carried out, along with full consultation with all stakeholders.

His amendment was voted down by 15 votes to 37 in favour of a motion proposed by convener Bill Lobban that the council would underwrite the first year of operation for any loss-making car parks.

Mr Lobban told the meeting: “The staff who carried out the review for the redesign board held 10 workshops and two board meetings over a lengthy period to come up with this set of recommendations.

“The recommendation proposed today gives assurance that no area will be disadvantaged in year one.”

Dingwall and Seaforth councillor Margaret Paterson said she was bitterly disappointed with the outcome.

She said: “I really thought that common sense would prevail and they would say yes, we have to consult first, and when they consulted they would discover it is not viable to put parking charges in Dingwall.

“But I have the courage of my convictions and if they go ahead and put parking charges in Dingwall I will go ahead and leave the administration.

“I know the people of Dingwall, they’re very strong and they won’t take it without a fight.”

After the outcome, Mr Mackenzie said he was “very despondent”.

He said: “The people in Dingwall are angry and feel ridden over roughshod by the council.

“It’s as if the council has said we’ve made mistakes but tough luck, we’re pressing on.”