Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘This is one for the bin’: Highland councillors angrily reject Boundary Commission electoral plans

Highland Council convener Bill Lobban said the Highlands are being treated as an afterthought. Image: Sandy McCook / DC Thomson
Highland Council convener Bill Lobban said the Highlands are being treated as an afterthought. Image: Sandy McCook / DC Thomson

There was a rare show of unity in the Highland Council chamber as members queued up to denounce the latest Boundary Commission proposals.

The Boundary Commission is tasked with reviewing the UK’s parliament constituencies.

The body is gathering views on its draft plans, with consultation due to close on 5 December.

Highland councillors unanimously agreed to fully reject the changes to Highland, which they said rode roughshod over community bonds.

Plans would split four Highland Council wards

The Boundary Commission has grouped together Highland, Moray and Argyll and Bute to create four proposed UK parliament constituencies.

Under its proposals, south Lochaber would be added to the whole of the Argyll and Bute council area in a constituency named Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber County.

The proposed Inverness-shire and Wester Ross County constituency would include
Inverness, Fort William, Skye and part of Wester Ross.

The Boundary Commission is reviewing representation at Westminster – but its proposals sparked outrage at Highland Council.

Nairn, Strathspey and Moray West County constituency would include
Badenoch and Strathspey, Nairn, and Elgin. This splits Moray into two constituencies.

Finally, the entire northern half of Highland Council would fall under the proposed Caithness, Sutherland Easter Ross County constituency.

If agreed, the proposals would see four Highland Council wards split apart and MPs straddling different local authorities.

It sparked a strong reaction from councillors across the chamber. Inverness member Alex Graham summed up the mood when he concluded: “This is one for the bin.”

Council to fight proposals with any means available

Councillor Jackie Hendry opened the debate by highlighting the impracticality of the plan. “If the boundary proposals proceed, we will have four councils wards that will be split – wards five, 12, 17 and 21. This will lead to a split to communities, and confusion.”

For example, Ms Hendry painted a scenario where Fort William wanted to bid for UK economic funding. The MP for Argyll, Bute and South Lochaber could only represent the area from Kinlochleven and below, she said. Any bid would require close collaboration with the MP for Inverness-shire and Wester Ross.

These proposals – which include reducing the number of elected representatives – will massively increase the democratic deficit our remote communities already feel.”

– Bill Lobban

“In a perfect world, this shouldn’t matter,” said Ms Hendry, “but we have to face realities.”

She added that councillors would need a detailed map to know which MP to refer local issues to.

While Ms Hendry hinted that political differences between MPs could hamper local projects, convener Bill Lobban went a little further.

“Not for the first time we see Highland treated as nothing more than an afterthought for an unrepresentative Boundary Commission,” he said. “These proposals – which include reducing the number of elected representatives – will massively increase the democratic deficit our remote communities already feel.”

He continued: “Far be it from me to question the impartiality of the Boundary Commission but someone less charitable than I could suggest that this was designed with rather more political ramifications than they’re prepared to accept.”

He called on the council to reject the proposals with whatever means available.

‘Are they mad?’

Conservative councillor Patrick Logue sought to remind the council that the Boundary Commission is non-partisan. However, the chamber appeared in no mood to mince its words.

The main focus of councillors’ outrage is the division of existing communities. Skye councillor John Finlayson said the people of Skye are being treated like “second class citizens” – subsumed into Inverness-shire and Wester Ross without so much as a name check.

Skye member John Finlayson slammed the proposals. Image: Jason Hedges / DC Thomson

Richard Gale was one of the last members to speak. He blasted the proposals as just “a man with a map and a pen, drawing some pictures.”

Council officers now have the task of summarising councillors’ views in an official response to the Boundary Commission.

Are you interested in more exclusive and breaking Highland and Islands news from the P&J? If so, why not join our dedicated Facebook page HERE

Conversation