Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Villagers disappointed as planners back housing scheme

Post Thumbnail

Villagers locked in a long-running battle over plans to build 20 houses near their homes have suffered a fresh setback, with council planners now backing the proposal.

Residents in St Fergus, outside Peterhead, have objected to plans for land at Newton Road as they say it will endanger their safety and destroy their privacy.

They were relieved in January when councillors knocked back the proposals, agreeing that they were “unsuitable for the site”.

But developers ARD Properties last month submitted a revised application to Aberdeenshire Council, aiming to allay any concerns by changing the level of the site and removing the cul-de-sac style.

A drainage way has also been designed to ease worries about flooding, and planning chiefs have now recommended that Banff and Buchan area committee approve the scheme on Tuesday.

Concerned resident Stephen Baird has complained about dust from the development blowing into his property already.

Last night, he said: “Breathing in construction dust isn’t just a nuisance, it can cause harm.”

Mr Baird also claimed that suggested “alterations to the landscaping scheme” designed to protect his privacy and prevent overshadowing are insufficient.

A spokeswoman for ARD Properties said some works had already gone ahead to make sure the site was safe for development.

The council’s head of infrastructure services, Stephen Archer, wrote in a report that the proposal was “acceptable”, with certain conditions attached.