Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Aberdeenshire councillors prepare to abandon plans for sport and culture trust – just weeks after approving it

Stonehaven and District Community Council launched a campaign to persuade  Aberdeenshire Council to scrap plans to transfer ownership to an arms-length trust. (Picture: Kenny Elrick)
Stonehaven and District Community Council launched a campaign to persuade Aberdeenshire Council to scrap plans to transfer ownership to an arms-length trust. (Picture: Kenny Elrick)

Aberdeenshire Council is poised to abandon controversial plans to create a trust to run local sports centres, libraries and museums – just weeks after approving the shake-up.

A war of words erupted between councillors last night as the local authority prepared to perform an embarrassing U-turn on the proposals next week.

But “delighted” community campaigners were celebrating the rethink.

Eyebrows were raised in November when councillors ignored warnings and agreed to press ahead with the trust despite uncertainty hanging over the future of a business rates exemption for such bodies.

And just days after the decision was taken, Finance Secretary Derek Mackay announced that the rates relief would only remain for existing arm’s length bodies, such as Sport Aberdeen, but not newly-created trusts.

It meant that a scheme which was supposed to save the Aberdeenshire Council £500,000 would now be expected to cost more than £600,000 in its first year.

As a result, councillors have been advised by officials to ditch the project at a full council meeting next week.

Officers have recommended drawing up plans to create an in-house unit to oversee the services instead.

Phil Mills-Bishop, chairman of Stonehaven and District Community Council, which opposed the shake-up, said: “I’m personally delighted. It is an amazing turnaround.

“My hope is elected members take note of the recommendation and take note of the growing community campaign.”

However, he added: “Who is going to account for the money that has been spent on this over the last year?”

Unison branch secretary Inez Teece, who had repeatedly urged the council to defer the decision, said: “We have been robustly engaged throughout the process, saying the same thing – that there was no guarantee there would be savings.

“We asked them to delay any decisions to avoid any expense and upset to staff. I’m disappointed they didn’t listen to us.”

Administration and opposition councillors last night attempted to blame each other ahead of Thursday’s meeting.

Opposition SNP leader Richard Thomson admitted that the decision by his party colleagues in government had left Aberdeenshire in an “iniquitous” position.

But he added: “The Tories and Lib Dems have shared power in Aberdeenshire for eight years out of the last 10. There was plenty of time for them to get a trust in place.

“Were it not for the drift, complacency and timidity that has been the collective hallmark of previous Tory/Lib Dem council administrations, we’d have been banking the financial benefits of this years ago.”

Council leader Jim Gifford said: “They had two years to push it through more quickly and didn’t, so I won’t take any lessons from them.”

He added: “There’s a report coming to full council. We could just push on as there were 10 or 11 good, solid reasons why an arm’s length trust is a good idea, and one of those was business rates relief.

“That decision obviously changes the business model. It’s a question of what do we do with the new information coming forward.”