Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Second round of objections by Highland councillors to Loch Ness pumped hydro scheme

Council Leader Margaret Davidson
Council Leader Margaret Davidson

Highland councillors yesterday raised objections to a hydro-scheme on Loch Ness for a second time.

South planning committee councillors considered further information from developers ILI Group of Hamilton, intended to allay their previously voiced concerns about the £625m Red John  400MW pumped hydro-scheme near Dores.

Against officials’ advice, the councillors voted to continue to raise objections to the development.

The Scottish Government will ultimately decide the fate of the development, and councillors expect it to go to a public local inquiry.

They voiced further concerns about the visual impact; about the developers’ pledge to use the Caledonian Canal to transport massive tunnel boring equipment; and about their pledge to build a park and ride near the Caley Thistle stadium in Inverness with 250 places for workers to reduce the increase in traffic during the construction period.

Council leader Margaret Davidson agreed that the conditions to be imposed on the development had been substantially improved, but said it was not a development in which she had confidence.

She said: “I’ve listened to both sides for some time now. This is Loch Ness, the reason why many people come to Scotland, it’s of huge importance.

“I’m really surprised at the extent and visual impact of it, and surprised at buildings to be left on the skyline.

“It might look OK in 15 to 20 years, but I don’t want to see a parkland on the hill, acres of grass.

“I don’t want to see a fundamental change to an area like this for hundreds of years.

“A reporter at a public local inquiry will go through this in much greater detail but for now it makes me uneasy.”

Mrs Davidson said she needed to be sure that the developer really could transport the tunnelling equipment down the canal.

She said: “They can’t bring it by road, they will have to bring it down the canal, but there has been very little commercial activity there, it’s very narrow and few boats can get along it.”

Mrs Davidson said she also wanted assurance that the constructions worker will definitely use the Park & Ride.

Councillor Ron MacWilliam also voiced his reservations.

He said: “The sheer scale of the project in the most sensitive of locations calls for no stone to be left unturned in its design and build, if it’s to go ahead at all.

“The project sits at the visual entrance to our majestic Loch Ness that visitors from all over the world come to revel in.

“I wouldn’t say that tourism considerations come above energy necessity, but in trying to balance environmental, resident concerns, and transport this one didn’t quite measure up.”