Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Neil McLennan: In a post-truth world April Fool’s Day could be 365 days of the year

We must try not to be taken for fool. Picture by Shutterstock
We must try not to be taken for fool. Picture by Shutterstock

It’s April Fool’s Day. In a post-truth, unthinking world it may be said that this should be 365 days of the year.

I remember an experience which sums up critical thought, or lack of it. I was an attendee at an inspiring leadership programme for young professionals. We were burrowed away in a hotel for a week together. There we discussed some of the most significant national and global issues and produced thoughts on solutions to the world’s woes.

As part of the programme each participant must prepare a speech in advance of attending. That speech is to be no more than five minutes long and is to answer any question the participant wishes – puzzling, insightful or topical.

One of the most amusing speeches during my time on the programme came from an attendee who now occupies a senior government role. His speech told us that an international Olympics committee had just approved “the super Olympics.” At these unique Games no limits would be put in place. Athletes could use all the performance enhancing drugs they liked and all rules were off. It was expected that viewers would see sub six second 100-metre sprint records being set. Moreover, there was to be horse racing with the jockey’s carrying the horse around the track.

Around the meeting room was a mixture of people splitting their sides and others looking on in wonder at what was being announced. And then the speaker hit the audience with his overarching question; “Why are people so gullible?”

It is an apt question indeed. In the modern world so many take so much at face value without critique, critical thought or candid consideration. We live in an area of quick messaging, believing easily and limited questioning.

We must keep a close eye on the oppressors and their tactics

And so how do we get closer to a world of deeper and more multi-perspective understanding of those around us and the complex issues our lives and the world faces?

It is becoming all the more difficult in a media world of marketing and political world of propaganda. The marketeers and PR gurus are in the ascendency in filling our now limited attention spans with what we want to hear. Very little challenges fixed thinking and mindsets.

Evidence goes nowhere and the truth always comes out – especially for those willing to look for it.

Universities should be spaces where a bulwark is put up against the thought-police, a voice against power and criminal control, and opening up narrow lenses. However even universities have slipped in places. Politicians have attempted to control their governance, markets have restricted them to business models that follow the money not the material that matters, and a managerial class have edged out anything that may be seen as controversial.

Recent news stories about Edinburgh University’s reliance on Chinese students has concerned some; and moreover the emergent assaults on academic’s freedom worry many. Academics are supposed to have “academic freedom” protected in law. But in a world of diminishing returns and narrow margins, some university leaders are prepared to sell their soul (and the soul of others) in the interest of commercial transactions over any moral imperative.

Professor Kathleen Stock of Sussex University was forced to resign after students complained about her work on transgender self-identification. Whilst Sussex University defended her academic freedoms, she resigned following the well-publicised incident. She described a culture of fear and self-censorship in British universities.

Once that space has gone – we are left with little else. The Dystopian nightmare of Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’ will have been enacted. And that is why we need to keep a close eye on the oppressors and their tactics.

We must challenge incorrect media messages

Media messages need to be considered and challenged where factually incorrect, inappropriate behaviours noted and challenged, human rights and freedoms protected; and attempts at ‘DARVO’ called out. This was a new phrase on me – “Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim & Offender”, the well-used tactics of oppressors called out for their harassment. We see it all too often when those who are evidenced for wrongdoing, try to turn the tables in a last-ditch act of personal professional protectionism.

The one positive in the modern world is the way in which evidence trails exist. They are perhaps stronger than ever, with email exchanges and records easier to hold, protect and share. Evidence goes nowhere and the truth always comes out – especially for those willing to look for it.

We must think carefully about the messages we see on social media. Picture by Yui Mok/PA Wire

Eric Hoffer said: “In times of change, learners inherit the earth, whilst the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists.”

That reminds me of William Golding’s “The Inheritors” – charting the extinction of the last remaining Neanderthal tribes by the more sophisticated Homo sapiens. Sadly, those Homo sapiens are not the “wise men” the Latin definition implies. They have become the modern fools. Arise the Homo Doctrina. That will take significant changes before that happens.

Meantime, on a daily basis let’s try to make sure we are not taken for fools.


Neil McLennan writes in a personal capacity. He is a Burgess of Aberdeen and has supported every aspect of education in the north-east

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]