Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Moray action group seeks input on A96 dualling routes

Susie Minto of the Forres A96 Community Group.
Susie Minto of the Forres A96 Community Group.

A Moray campaign group has demanded the Scottish Government assign the community a key role in the redesign of the A96.

The dualling of the road is a huge project for the entire region but some feel they have been airbrushed out of the consultation process by the Scottish Government.

The Forres Area A96 Dualling Action Group also believes the decision making process is progressing with undue haste, meaning that it may not best suit the town and surrounding area.

It wants to introduce a “co-creative process” that will give the community more say when it comes to finalising the best route.

That would see local people hold lengthy discussions with representatives from Transport Scotland to talk about the best way forward for the proposals.

Such a process has been used in connection with some of the soon-to-be-dualled sections of the A9 but appears not to be considered suitable for the A96.

After numerous requests and much correspondence with the Scottish Government, the action group feels locals have been “fobbed off” and are receiving “cut and paste” answers.

The public consultation about the prospective A96 dualling routes between Hardmuir and Fochabers closed on Friday and Transport Scotland plans to make a final decision by the end of the year.

Susie Minto, a member of the group, believes the process must be delayed that the local communities affected by the A96 routes need to have a greater say.

She said: “Through a co-creative process, we want to engage with Transport Scotland and slow down their process in order to talk about the best way forward with the people on the ground.

“Everyone should be working together to find the best case scenario for the route and the best way to do that is through community engagement.


>> Keep up to date with the latest news with The P&J newsletter


“Local people have more knowledge about these things than designers and architects and they have a way of finding out what suits the needs of people better.

“We have pointed to the success of the co-creative process at Dunkeld and Birnam as an example of how successful something like this can be.”

The co-creative process at Dunkeld and Birnam, near Perth, saw the local community there work in partnership with Transport Scotland to come up for the best route for the dual carriageway between Pass of Birnam and the Tay Crossing.

They worked together and a final public vote decided what route would be selected in the end.

Ms Minto thinks that the government should work to empower local people by working alongside them to make such an important decision.

She said: “This might be a definitive moment in the history of Forres, so the people here need to feel empowered and their opinions invited on board.

“The A96 dual road will be huge for the area and we need to have a proper say before its too late.

“Our group is a route neutral one. We just want to choose the best option for the region as a whole.”

With the A96 public consultation finishing last Friday, other Moray community groups have submitted their suggestions on preferred route options.

Innes Community Council chose the southern route around Forres and Elgin in the belief that, with the proposed upgrade of the military base at Kinloss, it would give better access to the A940 and reduce the risk of further congestion within Forres, especially from LGV’s.

A Transport Scotland spokesman said a co-creative process for the A96 would be “challenging,” but said it would keep the matter “under review”.

He said: “The co-creative process on the A9 began earlier this year and therefore it is too early to assess how it benefits the usual route options assessment process.

“Transport Scotland will always endeavour to use the most appropriate means of decision making as any of the schemes progress.”