Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Two-tier structure would breathe new life into game

ROME, ITALY - FEBRUARY 04:  Owen Farrell of England breaks through and goes on to score his sides third try during the NatWest Six Nations round One match between Italy and Engalnd at Stadio Olimpico on February 4, 2018 in Rome, Italy.  (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)
ROME, ITALY - FEBRUARY 04: Owen Farrell of England breaks through and goes on to score his sides third try during the NatWest Six Nations round One match between Italy and Engalnd at Stadio Olimpico on February 4, 2018 in Rome, Italy. (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

So now we know. After the first two rounds of the 2018 Six Nations Championship, there are five teams who are capable of giving each other a tough match, and four already have at least one win to their name.

Then there are the Italians, who have conceded 102 points in their brace of contests and were effectively beaten by Ireland in the opening 20 minutes in Dublin at the weekend.

It leaves one wondering whether it’s time to consider reshaping the format of European rugby, with a view to giving the Azzurri a wake-up call and expanding the opportunities to other countries who are making strides forward in the sport.

Let’s not pretend Scotland have suddenly moved into a different class from the side who lost at Murrayfield to the Italians as recently as 2015 and with whom they have shared too many battles for the wooden spoon.

But the reality is that it is nearly 20 years since Italy were admitted to Europe’s premier event – in 2000 – and neither their club representatives nor their national side have shown any signs of challenging for honours at home or abroad.

Surely their structure would be galvanised by the creation of a two-tier European event with the addition of Georgia, Romania, Russia and Spain or Portugal. At the outset, the plan would involve the introduction of the second-tier competition, but in four or five years time, by 2022 or 2023, there would be the potential for one of these countries to sup at the Six Nations table. This, of course, might be opposed by the established order, but Italy have had long enough to get their house sorted out, while the Romanians and Georgians have shown sufficient signs of their potential to be promised more than the occasional scrums of comfort by the IRB.

It’s time for the notion of the bottom side in the Six Nations – and yes it has been Scotland often enough in the last two decades – to face the real prospect of relegation, by meeting the leading team in the second division in a home-and-away play-off at the end of every season. Cricket is trying to increase the number of Test sides, with the introduction of Ireland and Afghanistan and while this duo might struggle to make an early impact, at least their presence will shake up the status quo.

The same has to happen in rugby. Not immediately, and not without the newcomers gaining more chances to prepare themselves for the challenge. But England have just confirmed they will be scrummaging with the Georgians this week to get ready for their Calcutta Cup clash with Scotland.

The world is changing. Rugby has to adapt to that process.