Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scottish Government’s chief scientific advisor says producers should be paid to tackle spread of livestock disease

Leading scientist Professor Julie Fitzpatrick is the director of the Moredun Research Institute.
Leading scientist Professor Julie Fitzpatrick is the director of the Moredun Research Institute.

One of Scotland’s leading scientists has proposed paying producers to tackle livestock diseases and improve animal health on their farms.

Professor Julie Fitzpatrick, the director of the Moredun Research Institute and chief scientific adviser to the Scottish Government, has already promoted the idea at top level workshops and meetings, and recommended the strategy in her response to the government’s Agriculture Bill consultation.

She told a press conference she hoped Scotland’s new agricultural support system would contain measures that encourage farmers to make more than token efforts towards animal health.

She also stressed that knowledge and techniques already at their disposal to tackle diseases would make farms more economically viable and greener by cutting greenhouse gases per unit of output.

‘It’s not rocket science’

She said: “My frustration is that we already have the answers. We just need farmers to take up the options, and with farm support it’s now or never.

“It’s not rocket science.

“If there was an incentive which benefited farmers’ pockets and provided those green solutions, to me it’s win, win, win – not just for economics and greenhouse gas emissions but for the animals themselves.”

Prof Fitzpatrick recommended paying producers for benchmarking – collecting disease data on abortions or antibiotic usage, for instance, and supplementing it with production or abattoir data.

And after the data is collected producers would attend virtual or in-person meetings to discuss the data and devise a strategy either on-farm with vets or in a knowledge exchange environment.

Targeting specified livestock illnesses could be a winner.
Targeting specified livestock illnesses could be a winner.

She said: “Once you have the data you can then measure interventions which could, for instance, include vaccinating cattle rather than giving them antibiotics.”

Prof Fitzpatrick said payments should not be based on results as diseases come and go but if there was no indication farmers had tried to apply livestock health benefits, payments could be withdrawn after three or five years.

She suggested individual farmers should pick up to three problem diseases and talk to their vet about how best to tackle them.

Target diseases for sheep might include OPA, lameness, abortion and scab and, for cattle, respiratory diseases, infertility and neonatal issues.

“It doesn’t need to be onerous,” Prof Fitzpatrick said.

“It’s about going back to farmers and letting them decide what their priority diseases are.

“It’s important to start with a vet and go for quick wins. If payments emphasise that, then farmers might find its something they can achieve with help.”