Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Scottish Government accused of leaving young farmers without financial support

Duncan Morrison
Duncan Morrison

A growing number of aspiring Scottish farmers feel “frustrated and angry” that a key ambition of the reformed Common Agricultural Policy (Cap) has failed and left them out in the cold without financial support.

Grant aiding genuine new entrants was a basic plank of the 2014 Cap reform, and schemes to support young farmers were introduced under both Pillar 1 direct support and the Pillar 2 Scottish Rural Development Programme (SRDP). However it is believed 75% of the SRDP budget has been spent in the first year of the schemes, and some of the hundreds of unsuccessful applicants have now started to speak out.

Aspiring Banchory farmer, Duncan Morrison (25) is the first to voice his frustration and admit he feels badly let down by the Government’s promises to support genuine new entrants.

He rented some fields and owned a “handful” of cattle over a two-year period which ended 18 months ago when he found a permanent job. He now has the opportunity to rent 50 acres and build a small herd but has been declared ineligible for grant aid because he had traded in the past.

“In the eyes of the authorities I’m not a new entrant,” he said. “But that’s exactly what I am.

“We hear the Scottish Government has blown the budget in the first year, with grants to applicants of £53,000 over three years. It would have helped if they’d halved that pay-out so there was some money left for more of us. I’d have bitten their hands off for £10,000.”

Mr Morrison said he wasn’t criticising other young farmers for taking the money.

“It’s not their fault that the system is wrong, but some of them don’t need the money. I know of a number of people who’re simply taking over control of their family businesses and entering new partnership agreements. That’s completely wrong because they were going to do that anyway, without financial support,” said Mr Morrison.

“The rules and the way they are being implemented is ridiculous.”

NFU Scotland (NFUS) director of policy, Jonnie Hall confirmed a “good number” of new entrants felt disadvantaged and frustrated by the way the Cap had worked out in practice.

“The Young Farmers and New Entrant start up grants under the SRDP were heavily oversubscribed. The Scottish Government spent 75% of the budget in year one and there are more disappointed than happy folk,” he said.

“Our young, innovative farming folk do feel with some justification that the new system – which was meant to be for them – has not delivered what they expected.”

In a statement a Scottish Government spokeswoman claimed the best ever policy offering had been negotiated for new entrants under Pillar 1.

She said: “Under the new Cap we can use the ‘national reserve’ to give payment entitlements to current new entrants; unlike under the old Cap, we can repeat this in future years so that future new entrants are not frozen out. As we have said before we will use the special provisions we negotiated to put previous new entrants, who lost out under the old Cap, onto a level playing field immediately instead of making them wait till the end of the transition period in 2019.”

Government confirmed that more than 100 young farmers and new entrants had been allocated start-up grants from the SRDP which in 2014-20 includes £8million of support to help new entrants start-up, with some £6million allocated to the Young Farmer Start-up Grant Scheme and £2million to the New Entrant Start-up Grant Scheme. The spokeswoman declined to reveal the number of unsuccessful applicants.

Already a subscriber? Sign in